{"id":1948,"date":"2025-11-06T14:52:07","date_gmt":"2025-11-06T13:52:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/projekt\/special-inspection-of-tension-cables-pt-ducts-gisundbrua-norway\/"},"modified":"2026-04-10T11:34:04","modified_gmt":"2026-04-10T09:34:04","slug":"special-inspection-of-tension-cables-pt-ducts-gisundbrua-norway","status":"publish","type":"projekt","link":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/en\/projekt\/special-inspection-of-tension-cables-pt-ducts-gisundbrua-norway\/","title":{"rendered":"Special inspection of tension cables (PT-ducts) &#8211; Gisundbrua, Norway"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Problem statement<\/strong><br\/>The Gisund Bridge, a concrete bridge built in 1972 with a total length of 1,147 meters, has post-tensioned cables in box girders. The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the status of the grout in the box girders (PT-ducts) and to identify any voids or deficiencies that may increase the risk of corrosion in the cables. The effort was motivated by previous observations of cracking in the load-bearing parts of the bridge deck and suspected deviations from the original design documents.  <\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"gb-block-image gb-block-image-f2a6daf2\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1080\" class=\"gb-image gb-image-f2a6daf2\" src=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Videoskop-halrum-i-foderor_Invator.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"Videoskop-ha\u030alrum-i-fodero\u0308r_Invator\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Videoskop-halrum-i-foderor_Invator.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Videoskop-halrum-i-foderor_Invator-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Videoskop-halrum-i-foderor_Invator-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Videoskop-halrum-i-foderor_Invator-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Videoskop-halrum-i-foderor_Invator-1536x864.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/>\n<figcaption class=\"gb-headline gb-headline-9269bb8f gb-headline-text\"><em>The investigations showed that several tensioning channels were inadequately grouted, which meant that the tensioning cables had suffered minor corrosion.<\/em><\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"gb-block-image gb-block-image-28b9ab44\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2000\" height=\"1125\" class=\"gb-image gb-image-28b9ab44\" src=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sprickor-Gisundbrua_Invator.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"Sprickor-Gisundbrua_Invator\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sprickor-Gisundbrua_Invator.jpg 2000w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sprickor-Gisundbrua_Invator-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sprickor-Gisundbrua_Invator-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sprickor-Gisundbrua_Invator-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Sprickor-Gisundbrua_Invator-1536x864.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2000px) 100vw, 2000px\" \/>\n<figcaption class=\"gb-headline gb-headline-151b1b2f gb-headline-text\"><em>Different types of cracking in walls and crossbeams were identified visually and by drone.<\/em><\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n\n<p><strong>Results<\/strong><br\/>The investigations showed that several tensioning channels were insufficiently grouted. Conduit 31 in both the north and south beams was largely empty of grout, which means that grouting was missed during construction. Minor corrosion attacks on the tension cables could be noted but no significant cross-sectional reduction. Partially filled casings had a greater risk of corrosion than completely empty ones, due to moisture in the grout. Furthermore, longitudinal cracks were noted in the walls near axis 10, which were interpreted as cracks caused by transverse forces from the clamping forces. It is possible that these already occurred during tensioning. In conclusion, two out of eight casings in the examined span were found to be without grouting. Recommendations include further investigation, especially of spans with known design deviations.       <\/p>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"gb-block-image gb-block-image-2ab58b31\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2000\" height=\"1125\" class=\"gb-image gb-image-2ab58b31\" src=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Stallning-for-arbete_Invator.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"Scaffolding-for-work_Invator\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Stallning-for-arbete_Invator.jpg 2000w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Stallning-for-arbete_Invator-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Stallning-for-arbete_Invator-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Stallning-for-arbete_Invator-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Stallning-for-arbete_Invator-1536x864.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2000px) 100vw, 2000px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<p><strong>Solution<\/strong><br\/>The inspection was carried out in several stages:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Review of drawings and previous documentation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>On-site visual inspection and drone inspection of hard-to-reach areas.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Locating reinforcement and cables with covermeter and GPR.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Accurate mapping of the position and status of the cables with MIRA (ultrasound tomography), in total about 950 B-scans.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Impact Echo (IE) verification, although the results were disturbed by ASR cracks.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Core drilling and openings in both the north and south beams, 11 openings in total. These confirmed that ducts 31N and 31S were unused. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p>This combination of non-destructive and destructive testing allowed for a reliable mapping of the grout status and corrosion risk.<\/p>\n\n<p>The next step is to develop appropriate repair methods.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"gb-block-image gb-block-image-353a4656\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"2000\" height=\"1125\" class=\"gb-image gb-image-353a4656\" src=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Scanning_Gisundbrua_Ivator.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"Scanning_Gisundbrua_Ivator\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Scanning_Gisundbrua_Ivator.jpg 2000w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Scanning_Gisundbrua_Ivator-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Scanning_Gisundbrua_Ivator-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Scanning_Gisundbrua_Ivator-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.invator.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Scanning_Gisundbrua_Ivator-1536x864.jpg 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2000px) 100vw, 2000px\" \/>\n<figcaption class=\"gb-headline gb-headline-5d8d6d24 gb-headline-text\"><em>Ultrasound scan of the Gisunda bride in Norway.<\/em><\/figcaption>\n<\/figure>\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<p><strong>Equipment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Covermeter (Profoscope+)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ground Penetrating Radar (Proceq GP8000\/GP8800)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ultrasound tomography (MIRA Tomographer)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Impact Echo (DOCter)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Drones (DJI Mavic 3 Pro)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Videoscope<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Core drills and forming equipment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p><strong>Standards<\/strong><\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>EN 1990 &#8211; Eurocode: Basic design rules<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>EN 1991-1-1 &#8211; Loads on structures<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>SS-EN 1992-1-1 &#8211; Concrete structures<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ISO 16311-1\/2 &#8211; Condition assessment of concrete structures<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Statens Vegvesen inspection manual (No. 718, 2021)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>During the inspection of the Gisund Bridge, a 1,147-meter-long concrete bridge built in 1972, Invator discovered deficiencies in the grout in several tensioning channels. Using drones, ultrasound tomography and verification drilling, the status of the cables and areas of increased corrosion risk were mapped for targeted repair measures. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1687,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"bransch":[19],"class_list":["post-1948","projekt","type-projekt","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","bransch-construction"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/projekt\/1948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/projekt"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/projekt"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1687"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"bransch","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.invator.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bransch?post=1948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}